2017 Lubec photo workshops: dates just announced               
              (See below) 
                
Vintage New York, Vintage Paris 
              Like fine wines, images that are both evocative and rich 
               
                
              By Frank Van Riper 
              Photography Columnist 
                        
          Two images from New York City  fifty years ago. I made the first one in the early 60’s at McSorley's Ale House  in lower Manhattan when I was a young student reporter at City College of New  York--who also spent time in bars; the second is of a NYC subway yard in the  north Bronx showing the dull grey trains that were the only means of  transportation to most non-driving New Yorkers of the era, save for buses and  feet. (Bikes back then were for kids and grocery store delivery guys; taxis  were for special occasions.) Both images will be part of my next book,  working-titled Recovered Memory--Vintage  Images of New York and Paris. But the remarkable thing is that I was able  to resurrect these photos at all.  
  
  
      | 
   
  
      | 
   
  
    | A gift from the digital gods: upper image was from a woefully underexposed Tri-X negative; bottom from faded, degraded Ektachome color slide. Both responded amazingly well to digital scanning and printing. (All images © Frank Van Riper. All Rights Reserved.) | 
   
 
  
          In working on a book that consists of photographs I made decades  ago, I confronted one immutable fact: you can’t go home again. That is to say:  on all my other books I could fall back on the fact that, if a particular image  were subpar, I could retake it next time, so there never really was a problem.  In the case of Recovered Memory, however,  my universe of images was limited totally and absolutely to what I already had shot—a  half century ago in New York City; forty years ago in Paris. Barring my sudden  invention of a time machine, there simply was no way I could expand on this  archive. So that meant I had to extract the most that I could—i.e.: cull the  best photographs from a necessarily limited universe--under what just a few  years ago might have been impossible circumstances. 
          And troglodyte though I may  be (I still think my analog Leica M6 is the best camera on the planet) I must  gratefully--even reverently--tip my hat to the digital technology that allowed  me to turn near-hopeless negatives and slides into book-worthy images. 
          But first, some history. 
          Why New York and Paris? New  York is simple: it’s what I am. I was born in Manhattan and grew up in the  Bronx, just blocks from Yankee Stadium. New York is in my blood, along with egg  creams, the Daily News and pastrami. Paris came more slowly, after my friends  Neil and Carol Offen moved there for what would be a nine-year stay, first in  Paris and then in Provence 
           “New  York is nothing like Paris; it is nothing like London,” the writer E.B. White  said in Here is New York, his  eloquent post-World War 2 essay on the city. “[A]nd it is not Spokane  multiplied by sixty or Detroit multiplied by four.”  
          Not  to disagree with one of the great essayists of his century, but New York is like Paris, or at least it was. As  I’ve written before, each city in its way is a beacon of style, culture,  brashness and charm. In addition each is ever-changing and each bounces neatly  off the other. I come naturally by my love of New York, having been born there.  Though I have traveled and photographed in other parts of France, Paris always  draws me back—as perhaps it would any New Yorker. I love Paris for its beauty,  its panache, its elegant symmetry: and yes, even for its subway. The three  shooting trips I made there some four decades ago produced a rich visual  archive that at its best rivals my file on New York.  
         
  
      | 
   
  
      | 
   
  
    | Top: I was pleased to deliver a new take on the Eiffel Tower, arguably one of the most photographed icons in the world. The clouds were very cooperative for this abstract. Bottom: composing room, New York Post. I love the dull sheen of steel and lead--not to mention the fact that this way of making front pages is long gone. | 
   
 
      
          The ten-year difference between my New York and Paris work  simply reflects what I was doing at the time. In the 60’s, when I shot my  vintage New York photos, I was a student at CCNY and editor of its  undergraduate newspaper, The Campus. Within ten years I already was a reporter  in the New York Daily News Washington bureau, married (to my first wife) and  regularly traveling to Paris, a city that drew me like a magnet. 
           Paris  was a city where, unless you tried to have it otherwise, no one knew your name.  One was free to wander its ancient streets, cross its beautiful bridges,  meander along the Seine, in wonder and anonymity. The subway vaguely resembled  New York’s but back then at least some of the trains ran on rubber tires, and  you still could find the occasional wooden subway car, usually in the First  Class compartments (an only-in-Paris anomaly that would fall flat on its ass  in the Apple.) The rush hour crowds were very much like New York’s back then:  people buried in their newspapers (not their iPads,) the atmosphere  occasionally punctuated, it must be said, by body odor and garlic breath.  
           I  say this not in condescension, for Paris also was a city that graced its subway  stations with near full-size replicas of Rodin’s great sculptures. 
          “On any person who desires such queer prizes, New York will  bestow the gift of loneliness and the gift of privacy,” said E.B. White. “[T]he  residents of Manhattan are to a large extent strangers who have pulled up  stakes somewhere and come to town, seeking sanctuary or fulfillment or some  greater or lesser grail….No one should come to New York to live unless he is  willing to be lucky.”  
          It is parallels like this between these two great cities that  suggested my next book. 
  
  
      | 
   
  
      | 
   
  
    | It's only now, in looking at these two photos in juxtaposition, that I noticed the almost identical hand gesture: the first in 'Penn Station Farewell;' the second in 'Lady of Fashion/Paris.' | 
   
 
                  
          But first I had to overcome some of my own early stumbles as a  young photographer. My first film of New York, for example, was developed in a  Kodak Day-Load Tank, an ingenious Rube Goldberg-like affair that, once threaded  and closed, allowed one to load 35mm film directly from its cassette onto a  developing reel without one having to be in the dark. That part was fine when  it worked (it didn’t always.) But my agitation technique also was lame back  then, so several rolls of film that I souped in the Day-Load Tank displayed a  tell-tale line along the bottom of the negative strip indicating poor  agitation. Happily, I was able to crop this out in virtually all of the final  prints I made.   
           Still, even good Day-Load technique could not compensate for really poor initial  exposure. The McSorley's pic, for example, is from a woefully thin Tri-X  negative that I despaired I ever would be able to print in a traditional wet  darkroom. And the subway image actually was made on what turned out to be very  unstable Ektachrome-X color slide film. This meant that the vibrant colors of  the original chrome had faded over decades to a dull purple, melting all the  photo’s shadow detail into a stygian mush.  
 
 
  
      | 
   
  
      | 
   
  
    | Top photo shows my  badly underexposed negative from McSorley's. Regular darkroom prints from the neg lacked snap and contrast. Bottom shows what my once-terrific Ektachrome X image had become: a purple mess. | 
   
 
      
          That I was able to digitally scan  both images to recover what I think is remarkable detail is tantamount to  divine intervention.  
          Praise here for my Epson V750  Pro flatbed scanner that worked wonders scanning both positive transparencies,  like the Ektachrome slide of the subway yard, or BxW negatives like the ones made  at McSorley’s. The V750 (succeeded now by the V800) in effect sucked as much  detail as possible out of the initial subpar “source material.” This in turn  allowed me far more leeway than I ever could have in a conventional darkroom to  manipulate tone, saturation, contrast and relative exposure levels in my final  digital prints. Once the images were “developed” to my liking on my calibrated  Mac desktop, I was able to produce gorgeous prints on Epson Hot Press Bright  smooth matte paper with a Canon Pro 10 digital printer and its set of ten  archival inks.  
          As I work on the archive of  these vintage images, another fact becomes blindingly clear to me: the only  constant in life is change. Everything will be different sooner or later, so  that photos made years ago have intrinsic value simply because they reflect a  time and conditions that are gone forever. Granted, this means that even a  mediocre snapshot has merit for its insight into the past—but it might not be  something I’d want to publish. 
          It’s when a vintage image also  is a first rate photograph that the magic happens. 
  
  
      | 
   
  
      | 
   
  
    | Top: Protestors were much better behaved--and better dressed--in the New York of 50 years ago. Bottom: I saw this little guy in a Paris doorway and was delighted when he patiently stood for several portraits.  | 
   
 
  
      
----- 
              Lubec Photo Workshops at SummerKeys, Lubec, Maine -- Summer, 2017 dates just announced... 
                
              Daunted by  Rockport??  
                 
                      Spend a week of hands-on learning and location photography with award-winning  husband and wife photographer-authors Frank Van Riper and Judith Goodman. Frank  and Judy will cover portraiture, landscape and documentary photography during  morning instruction, followed by assignments in multiple locations including  Quoddy Head State Park, Campobello Island, NB and the colorful town of Lubec  itself. Daily critiques and one-on-one instruction. NO entrance requirement.  Minimum age for attendance is 16. Maximum number of students each week is nine.  Students supply their own digital camera.  
                      The Lubec Photo Workshops debuted in 2009 and were a huge success  for their low-key, no-pressure atmosphere. Note: Classes fill early.  
                      2017  workshop dates: July 17-21; July 31-August 4; August 14-18. 
                       Tuition payable through the SummerKeys Music Workshops: www.SummerKeys.com   
                
                     Or  contact us:  GVR@GVRphoto.com 
              NEW: Master Photo Classes with Frank Van Riper 
                      These intense, three-day, limited enrollment classes are aimed at the more advanced student, who already has taken a photo workshop and who is familiar with basic flash. With a maximum enrollment of just five, these classes are nearly half the size of our regular workshops. NB: last summer's Master Classes were fully booked almost immediately. 
                       
        2017 Master Photo Class dates:July 24-26; August 21-23 
        Come  photograph in one of the most beautiful spots on earth! 
                               
----------- 
       
Van Riper Named to Communications Hall of Fame 
                
                
                    | 
                 
                
                  | Frank Van Riper addresses CCNY Communications Alumni at National Arts Club in Manhattan after induction into Communications Alumni Hall of Fame, May 2011.    (c) Judith Goodman | 
                 
               
                                    
                  [Copyright Frank Van Riper. All Rights Reserved.  Published  2/17] 
                
                               |